watercressOne study has found a compound in watercress that could turn off a protein that breast cancer needs to grow. Other studies have shown that broccoli and cauliflower can reduce lung cancer. Tomatoes, carrots, and blackberries contain compounds that fight cancer and heart disease.

Read the full article of how watercress may ‘turn off’ breast cancer signal in the Science Daily

Watercress has now become my new power food!

Breast Cancer Vaccine in 2015

vaccineMaybe we will have a breast cancer vaccine this year. Here’s why I think so:

Results of a small study published in Clinical Cancer Research have shown that a new breast cancer vaccine is safe to give to people.

The vaccine targets mammaglobin-A (MAM-A), a breast cancer-related antigen (a toxin or substance that causes an immune response in the body). In the study, the vaccine was given to 14 patients with stable metastatic breast cancer who had been off chemotherapy for at least 30 days. Analysis showed that, after they got the vaccine, the patients had significant increases in the number of immune cells targeting MAM-A, with no serious adverse side effects.

If further research goes well, the vacccine may ultimately serve as an effective treatment for early-stage breast cancer.

The research team was led by William Gillanders, MD, of the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. In a recent interview with Cancer Therapy Advisor, Dr. Gillanders shared his optimism about the study results. “We learned that targeting MAM-A is a safe and very promising therapy for breast cancer,” he told the publication. He also said that MAM-A is a “highly attractive target” because it is overexpressed (meaning there are many “copies” of the gene) in breast cancer but not in other tissues. According to Gillanders, recent studies suggest that between 60 percent and 70 percent of breast cancer tumors have the MAM-A antigen.

The next step in the research will be to give the vaccine to patients in the early stages of the disease because. Gillanders explained that “there is a growing realization that vaccine therapy is most effective in the earlier stages of cancer.” The trial will be unique in that patients will be given the vaccine before surgery so that researchers will be able to evaluate the immune response in tumor tissue samples taken during surgery.

-Elizabeth Chabner Thompson, MD, MPH Women’s Wellness

Are we past ‘aware’?

Founder and spokesperson of the Center for Transparency Bobbie Shay Lee, a survivor herself after 22 surgeries, makes a good argument.  Aren’t we past ‘awareness’ and lost our way to our goal?  What does all the pink and events signify and where does all that money go?

“Where Does the ‘Pink’ Money Go?

These corporations and organizations, padded with millions in charitable gifts, have lost sight of their role — and for many, their mission. They are not providing critical therapies breast cancer patients need to survive. Nor do they provide basic needs, like food and transportation, for those who are fighting cancer and are unable to work.

You never hear of a single organization that helps in covering funeral costs (a last attempt to give those who succumb to this horrific disease the dignity they deserve). I suppose they will brag about the dollars committed to research, so tell me more about the research findings? Surely the billions of dollars committed over the past three decades has resulted in some groundbreaking advances?

Pink Is Fine, but Something Has to Change

I have been a “survivor” for almost two decades, since being diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 25. Throughout my evolution, which began during my time as an NFL cheerleader, I have became a voice for those who needed one. I defied the odds to become a mother, and forever became part of the sisterhood breast cancer brings into your life. In each phase of this journey, I am grateful for the struggles — as well as broke from 22 surgeries — but empowered to change how we fight this battle.


Know Someone With Breast Cancer? Help Them Directly

Creating change won’t be easy, but let’s make a vow this month to be activists, not pacifists. Participate in every event you feel deserves your contribution. Ask questions before you make a donation. Check the merchandise label to see exactly how much of your purchase is donated to the cause and mission of the organization receiving funds.

Directly support those around you who are affected by breast cancer! Find a way to make your investment count! Give someone a ride to therapy. Buy groceries for that single mom going through treatment. We decide how and what our campaign for compassion should be. It’s time we start making it count!”.


Not just October


October was christened as Breast Cancer Awareness month, but breast cancer does not just happen in October.  Please be vigilant every month.   Below are links for some of the best creative BC awareness ads this year:


Here’s one from the above list.


Strength & Love

One  young mother’s determination for a final wedding dance at her son’s marriage ceremony beat the disease.  She lived and will live for eternity in that precious moment.

Bare Reality

bare reality

Photographer Laura Dodsworth started the project after becoming frustrated with how breasts were shown in the media, feeling that most portrayals created an “unobtainable ideal.”

“I felt compelled to embark on a personal exploration of what it means to be a woman,” Dodsworth told The Huffington Post in an email. “To understand women’s experiences through their body. I wanted to re-humanize women through honest photography and interviews, present our breasts as they really are and burst the ‘fantasy bubble’ of the youthful, idealized and sexualized breasts presented by the media.”

bare reality

© Copyright Laura Dodsworth 2012-2014. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

The book features photographs of women aged 19 to 101, of all breast sizes and sexualities. Some women talk about how their breasts give them confidence, while others reveal struggles with self-esteem related to their cup size.

All of the stories remind us that women should be proud of their bodies despite the size, appearance or presence of their breasts.

In an anecdote from the project posted on The New Statesman today, one woman shares her experience with breast cancer and a subsequent mastectomy.

bare reality

© Copyright Laura Dodsworth 2012-2014. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

The woman, age 54, also discusses her decision to cover the scar with a floral tattoo rather than undergoing reconstructive surgery.

I don’t think I could have psychologically come to terms with my “battle scar” as easily without the tattoo. It would have taken a lot longer to look in the mirror and feel okay about the scar where the boob was. It makes a statement and it’s pretty to look at. I’m proud of it. I want people to realize you don’t have to hide away, just because you’ve had breast cancer.

For each book sold, a donation will be made to Breast Cancer UK.

Dodsworth, who is herself the 100th person profiled in the book, hopes that the project will empower women and assure them that, no matter how complicated their relationships with their breasts, they are not alone.

“Bare Reality has changed me, and changed how I think and feel about women.” she told HuffPost. “It has transformed my relationship with my breasts. Quite simply, I like myself more as a woman, and I like my breasts more.”  Learn more here.

New Swimwear Line Proves you Don’t need 2 breasts to Look Sexy

from The Huntington Post, Ryan Grenoble, posted 5/28/14:


“Who says you need two?”

That’s the question a group of breast cancer survivors and supporters are asking after founding “Monokini 2.0,” a social art project centered on swimwear designed for women who have had a mastectomy.

“We think that the current focus on a breast-reconstruction after mastectomy as the only way to a full life, is a breast-fixated way of seeing what a woman is,” the group wrote on Facebook. “We want to incite a positive self-image of breast-operated women by showing that you can be whole, beautiful and sexy even with just one breast or with no breasts at all.”

Monokini 2.0 features the work of seven fashion designers from Finland and the U.S., and a handful of models who have lost one or both breasts as a result of a mastectomy.

The project is the brainchild of Elina Halttunen, a breast cancer survivor. In a release, Halttunen explained the idea came from her own experiences after having had a breast removed:

“I do not want to hide, I do not want to stop swimming, I do not want to undergo extensive plastic surgery operations, and I do not want to be forced to use the uncomfortable prosthesis on the beach,” Halttunen said in a release, explaining that the idea came from her own experiences after having had a breast removed. “I want to feel as free and active as I did before my cancer, and I am pretty sure that there are others out there like me.”


To view some of the bathing suit line and the courageous and natural women who model them, visit

Dense Breast Tissue = MRI

MRI-foundationActress Christina Applegate had a double mastectomy in 2008.  What follows is an article about how she discovered it.
“I lost my mind,” said Christina, 42, when asked how she reacted to her diagnosis. “I still sometimes lose my mind six years later. You look down and you have a daily reminder of everything that you’ve gone through.”

The double mastectomy saved her life after her breast cancer was detected by an MRI when she was 36 years old. “I started getting mammograms at 30, but my doctor said ‘the mammograms are not working for you because you’re too dense, and so we’re going to do an MRI.’ It was with that MRI that I found cancer, years before a mammogram would have.”

The former “Married with Children” star finds that as a mother to Sadie Grace, she worries that the foods we eat have something to do with women getting cancer so early on in life. “We have her on a completely plant-based diet,” she told ET’s Brooke Anderson. “It’s because I want her to have the best chance possible.”

Today, Christina’s foundation Right Action for Women gives free MRIs for high-risk women. “Were into almost 500 now,” said Christina. “We’ve spent over half a million dollars on MRIs, which is really incredible.”

If you have dense breast tissue and are at risk, and cannot afford an MRI, you may wish to visit her website which helps women like you.

Less invasive procedure destroyed all cancer cells when tumor was 1 centimeter or less.

o-NEW-YORK-TIMES-570Interesting new technique.  Here’s my concern…. when I was diagnosed with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in Situ), they identified one area.  Post mastectomy and upon analysis of the tissue removed, they found other DCIS cells not previously identified.

Had we simply ‘frozen’ the identified cells, I would have ended up having breast cancer again…either more DCIS or it might have progressed to another stage.  This is not a ‘sure thing’ yet, so proceed with caution.

“A tumor-freezing technique might offer a reasonable alternative to surgery for some women with early stage breast cancer, a preliminary study suggests.

The research, to be reported Wednesday at the American Society of Breast Surgeons annual meeting in Las Vegas, looked at a treatment called cryoablation. The approach, also called cryotherapy, uses substances such as liquid nitrogen or argon gas to freeze and destroy cancer cells.

Cryoablation is already an option for benign breast tumors called fibroadenomas, and for certain cancers — including some cases of skin, prostate and liver cancers. But researchers are just beginning to look into its potential for breast cancer.

The new study included 86 women with early stage invasive ductal breast cancer — which means the cancer had begun to invade the fatty tissue around the milk ducts.

The standard treatment is to surgically remove the cancer, usually followed by radiation. And it’s very effective; the five-year survival rate for stage 1 breast cancer is 100 percent, according to the American Cancer Society.

Still, some researchers want to find less invasive treatments — especially since breast cancer screening often finds tiny tumors, explained study author Dr. Rache Simmons.

Cryoablation fits the “less invasive” bill: A surgeon inserts a thin probe through a small incision in the skin, and then — guided by ultrasound — targets and freezes the tumor.

There are potential advantages of cryoablation over conventional surgery, according to Simmons, who is chief of breast surgery at New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York City.

For one, it can be done with local anesthesia, and it avoids the pain and hospital stay that comes with surgery. “Cryoablation lends itself very well to the outpatient setting,” Simmons said.

And afterward, she noted, there’s no surgical scar.

But cryoablation also has to work. To put it to a preliminary test, Simmons and her colleagues treated all of their study patients with the procedure, then looked at the immediate results.

Overall, the treatment was only moderately successful: It got rid of all evidence of the cancer in 69 percent of the women. The rest of the women still had some “residual” cancer.

However, Simmons said, the treatment was “100 percent effective” in a subset of women with the smallest tumors — about 1 centimeter or less. So it’s possible that for those women, cryoablation could be a new option.

An expert not involved in the study urged caution, however. “We already have a very good treatment” in conventional surgery, said Dr. Subhakar Mutyala, associate director of the Scott & White Cancer Institute in Temple, Texas.

He noted that even when women are not able to have major surgery, minimally invasive surgery — which uses small incisions — may be an option.

Why is the ‘cure’ a drug?

molehilllComing to us from San Antonio Texas,  this story:

“Women at high risk of developing breast cancer because of family history or bad genes have a new option to help prevent the disease.

A study of 4,000 women found that a daily hormone-blocking pill cut the risk of developing breast cancer by more than half after five years of use.

The drug is anastrozole (uh-NASS’-truh-zole), sold as Arimidex (uh-RIM’-uh-dex) and in generic form. It can cause hot flashes, joint pain and other side effects, but these were nearly as common among women given dummy pills and are often due to menopause and aging.

Results were reported Thursday at a cancer conference in San Antonio”

Is this a surprise?  Not terribly.  My fear in this is much like vitamin crazes or drugs that the pharmaceutical companies profit by… marketing something that alters your body genetically always always has repercussions….    In this case, the fear is that women will buy and consume this drug and years later discover that it has a harmful ‘side effect’ – in essence, trying to ‘fix’ something and break something else in the body.

Before we chase after drugs, let’s identify the why is cancer among us and how do we eliminate it!

Previous Older Entries

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.